Sweatshops generally are factories that provide workers with socially unacceptable working conditions, especially dealing with clothing items. With the expanding apparel industries around the world, more and more corporations are using sweatshop factories to their advantage In a sweatshop it is very humid and really hard to work in. In most of the sweatshops the living quarters are crowded and filthy, which can lead to the spread of germs very easily (blogger.com~nshah/fashioncrimes/blogger.com Another alarming component of sweatshops is there are a lot of fire hazards May 07, · This essay on Sweatshops Working Condition was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly
Law: the Morality of the Sweatshops - Words | Essay Example
Sweatshops refer to working conditions that are dangerous and unhealthy for any human being to work. People working in sweatshops are forced to work for long hours without receiving adequate pay regardless to the laws enacted to govern the workplace.
Though the employees work for long hours which may exceed the normal working hours in a day, they are not paid for overtime. In sweatshops, employees are exploited and overworked by their employers. The employer also prohibits such employees from joining workers sweatshops essay which can protect them. Though sweatshops have unfavorable working condition and the employees are paid less, the sweatshops provide a sweatshops essay for the low class people to earn a living.
Sweatshop conditions are usually in manufacturers and companies with unfair, risky and dirty working environment. These conditions exploit workers who cannot afford employment in a good environment. They create opportunities for uneducated and unskilled young people to work and earn a living.
This encourages students to drop out of school and seek employment in the sweatshops essay. Additionally, some companies take advantage of children and overwork them sweatshops. Companies which contract sweatshops to manufacture their products claim their practice in good for them since they are able to take advantage and compete favorably offering low cost products to their customers.
Social economists and analysts have varied views on that issue. Some say that, use of sweatshops labor harm workers who lose job when a company contract manufacturing works abroad Fraser, Machines that are used by workers in sweatshops are poorly maintained and dangerous to operate, sweatshops essay.
These faulty equipments cause injuries to workers. Some workers suffer minor injuries while others suffer severe injuries that leave them disabled, sweatshops essay. When a worker is injured the employer fails to take responsibility and leaves the employee to suffer alone. Other injuries make workers unable to do their job sweatshops essay they are fired. In such cases, the employer fires the affected employees without compensation.
Poor ventilation in manufacturing factories results in poor air circulating. This makes the place stuffy and increases the chances of contracting airborne diseases, sweatshops essay.
Due to lack of proper ventilation, the workers are affected by poisonous gas which they breathe from materials being processed. This leads to workers suffering from health problems, sweatshops essay. Additionally, there are conditions where there are bugs and sweatshops essay. These make the situation worse resulting in diseases Thomas J. DiLorenzo Even if sweatshops provide job opportunities, working in a sweatshop is not the best option for employees.
They would opt to work in better working environment. It is seen that in sweatshops, workers are forced to work for long hours and in return, they receive low pay. Companies try to keep their cost low by giving low wages and fail to meet the requirements of minimum pay standards. These wages are low and are considered starvation pay.
Sweatshops increase with growth in industrialization which creates new job vacancies. The new job opportunities attract people and they leave farming to join the factories. The conditions in the factories are grim: workers operate machinery without safety gadgets, poorly ventilated workplaces and in environment vulnerable to accidents, fire and even suffer from physical abuse.
Businesses opt to use sweatshops in their search to minimize cost of production through cheap labor and maximize profit. They exploit workers by providing harsh working conditions and taking advantage of people who are desperately looking for jobs Sweatshops, Sweatshops violate human rights and do not provide protection to employees at the workplace.
The conditions of a sweatshop are not fit for sweatshops essay health. Sweatshop owners are the sole beneficially and regard workers in their factory as expenditure and they do not treat them like human beings. Workers receive low wages to keep the company expenditures low. The workers decide to stay in the sweatshop with all the harsh conditions because they can easily lose the opportunity.
There is no room to bargain since workers are forced to take the position, or forfeit the opportunity. It is evident that in sweatshops there is low demand for more human labor and this makes managers to enslave their workers Williams, sweatshops essay, Sweatshops have always been dangerous and uncomfortable for workers, sweatshops essay. The working conditions in the sweatshops do not pay well as the average modern white color jobs.
Though the working conditions are unfavorable, most of the things used in everyday life such as clothes and shoes are made in these sweatshops. People imagine that the items they use are made in clean automated factories where workers are well remunerated.
The society imagines that no pain or suffering is involved when developing these goods. When people realize the conditions that the workers go through when producing goods in sweatshops, they are quick to judge and curse the employers for mistreating the employees. However, it is important to note that these factories provide jobs for the low working class in the sweatshops essay. Without these jobs, sweatshops essay, such people would be in abject poverty.
This would only lead to more people begging on the streets, sweatshops essay. If there are a lot of unemployed people in the society, other problems would arise as well. There would be increased prostitution and crime. This would not promote quality of their life instead; it would further deteriorate and put their lives in danger.
People who work in sweatshop remain there for a long time because they are not qualified for better jobs. Though it is evident that the sweatshops owners exploit their employees, they also present to them a livelihood.
The employers find that it is not possible to increase the wages for sweatshops essay workers since these would translate to a loss on their side. The only logical method to end the problem of sweatshops that would not lead to employer making loses would be to automate the process of production. This would lead to the workers losing their jobs. Though the employer would require a huge capital to set up the machinery for the company, it would lead to high production in the long run.
The company would be able to produce more goods at prices affordable by the average consumer. However, sweatshops essay, this would have the disadvantage of rendering most of the workers jobless, sweatshops essay. Having human workers at the factories doing the work that would otherwise be done using machinery increases the cost of production. This also reduces the number of products produced per unit time, sweatshops essay.
This translates to high prices for the goods produced; these goods end up unaffordable to the average consumer. The customers would no longer afford the goods that the sweatshops essay produces due to increased prices.
The employees who work in the sweatshops prefer to maintain the status quo since this would mean that they will keep their jobs although the working conditions are unfavorable. Companies that sweatshops essay on sweatshops essay sweatshop labor are able to sell their products at lower prices compared to the companies that do not sweatshops essay sweatshop labor.
Sweatshops labor is voluntary and people who decide to work there do it because they feel they are unable to acquire a better job due to various reasons such as level of education or qualification. Due to the intensity of work at sweatshops, a lot of labor force is required. Therefore, a sweatshop is sweatshops essay to employ a lot of people who would sweatshops essay be jobless. Research indicates sweatshops essay most people who support sweatshops are employees who work there, sweatshops essay.
This is because, such employees are aware of the fact that if they would demand high payment for their work, the employers would not be able to sustain them. This is because; the business would become unstable due to high cost of production, sweatshops essay. In an attempt to sweatshops essay the cost of production, sweatshops essay, the employers would be forced to seek less costly labor such as use of machines and automation.
If the employers are not able to make profit, sweatshops essay, there would be less investment in other new businesses as well. This would lead to slow economic growth for the country, sweatshops essay, and in turn, the currency would weaken.
Weakening of the currency of a country would lead to poor quality of sweatshops essay for all citizens, sweatshops essay. For example, the Americans citizens protested against the outsourcing of the textile mills. The companies wanted to outsource because they felt that the factories were horrible and polluted the environment.
There was also the problem of low wages for the employees who worked in those companies and poor working conditions. However, the Americans protested against the idea of outsourcing the textile mills because, despite being unfavorable, employment at the textile mills was the only job that they could secure Woog, If the employees are provided with better working conditions and they are paid well, the cost of production would increase. This will lead to the company increasing sweatshops essay cost of the goods sold in order to cover for the production cost.
Due to increased cost of goods and services offered by such companies, less people in the society will afford the items due to the sudden increase in cost. This would lead to reduced sales. If people do not buy the products, the company would have less money to spend on its employees and thus, it would be forced to either fire the employees or reduce their wages in order to sustain them.
Such company will be forced to either pay sweatshops essay workers less and less, or continue firing its employees until it shuts down. The employer would opt to replace the large number of people with a machine that would be able to produce more goods per unit time at a lower cost of production compared to people working in the sweatshops Sweatshops, Though the working conditions of a sweatshop are unfavorable, they are a good source of income and provide employment opportunities to many people.
It is through these sweatshops that most low income earners are able to afford food for their families, sweatshops essay. Featherstone, L. Students against sweatshops.
London: Verso. Fraser, J. White-collar sweatshop: The deterioration of work and its rewards in corporate America. New York: Norton.
Sweatshops STILL Exist in the US - What we can do about it
, time: 6:34Essay on sweatshops - Words | Bartleby
Sweatshops Essay Words | 6 Pages. questionable morality of sweatshops has become a highly contested ethical issue. Some argue that sweatshops offer more opportunities for poor workers, and are thus good. Others view inhumane working conditions and exploitation in these factories as prohibitive of good moral practice Sweatshops Essay Words | 4 Pages. Sweatshops over the world can be improved through simple and big changes on both the foreign as well as American fronts. Sweatshops have always been viewed as a negative thing but no one has really tried to change or improve upon them, it is more of an out of sight out of mind mentality Sweatshops Essay 9 September Thomas Carson’s article criticize Ian Maitland’s arguments in defense of sweatshops, based on Ian’s view of “the Classical Liberal Standard” published in , in the Brithish Academy of Managment Annual Conference blogger.comted Reading Time: 8 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment